crysis optimization

Crysis is better optimized than some people on the froums give it credit for. For example I have a ati hd 3850, and I'm able to just max COD4 at 1440 X 900. While on crysis I can get it on medium/ high, and crysis looks far better than cod4 at these's settings. I just want people see that crysis is a great optimized game when your playing on low/med/high, but Very high is a different story.crysis optimization
Well, I'm laying Everything @ High + 2X AA but the resolution is 1024x768.28FPS in average. Always between 20FPS-35FPS.crysis optimization
I think Crysis is extremely well optimised, I just think people don't think about it rationally. Crysis looks great, but that visual standard isn't the only thing to consider. There's the large, open world. Actually, no. There's the freaking huge, open world.Take the next big corridor engine, where the biggest area it has to render is barely one tenth of what Crysis deals with, and those same people moaning about how badly optimised Crysis is might be getting +15fps up on Crysis, will go and say that engine x is better optimised than CryEngine 2. Totally ignoring the fact that Crysis doesn't just give you a beautiful world - it gives you a world. A world outside of the corridor.I don't think the engine is truly ready for mainstream consumption yet - but for the 15% who own good8 series cards, Crysis is huge and beautiful, and it runs extremely well.For everyone else, you have to wait a year or whatever to truly appreciate just how spectacular this engine is, when the mid level hardware has overtaken the engine. But by then, they'll probably be complaining about something else.I play with everything on high @ 1600x1200, no AA. It doesn't run flawlessly - but it does run very smoothly for the most part (never checked the frame rate, don't feel a need to... it's definitely in the mid 30s I'd guess). I find myself wondering if any existing hardware can run Crysis on all high (nevermind very high) without occasional hiccups. There's a difference between poor optimisation and steep hardware requirements.
Yes honestly I find it astonishing when people say that Crysis isn't well optimized. Taking what the game is, the most gorgeous game created, a huge open world, wide variety of effects and decent A.I., I'm surprised it runs so well on modern hardware / 8800GTX. Seriously that year old card is running Crysis quite well. If anyone wants to put the blame for Crysis' performance on anything, I'd say it should be on Nvidia for not releasing the next gen top-of-the-line cards.
i get 40-65fps on a 8800GTs 512MB. All high, 1360x768 res.
I leave everything Very High @ 12x10 no AA.There's no hiccups at all, even during that AA guns level where there's crazy stuff happening all over. It lags at the very start though when I start the game from windows and load my save. Lags there for a few seconds then stops.
Not to mention how tweakable the darn game is. Tweaking it in itself becomes an obsession.
[QUOTE=''kutty12000'']Not to mention how tweakable the darn game is. Tweaking it in itself becomes an obsession. [/QUOTE]probably what I love most about crysis. :)
Yup. My cousin who's working on a UE3 game told me how amazed he was at crysis while the unreal engine is just slow.
gears of war is the worst imo...that game is just so buggy.
I really think this game isn't optimized well at all. I have a good cpu and gpu and play it find high/very high. The physics at very high kills my cpu/gpu and i think its just BS. Go watch ANY Mercenaries 2 video and you will see almost identical physics. The trees fall down and EVERY building in the game is fully destructible. Obviously the graphics aren't even close to touching Crysis but the physics in Crysis were just not optimized well. If a game running on a 360 and ps3 runs at very playable frame rates with insane physics then the physics in crysis should not affect performance as much as it does. Im just saying an 8800 GT should be able to kill any game the ps3 or 360 has to offer and if those consoles can handle very similar physics if not better then Crysis should run just as well if you ask me.BTW i think EA forced them to rush out the game before holidays. If it were upto Crytec im sure this game would be able to be maxed with an 8800 gts 640 easily.
[QUOTE=''bigblunt537'']BTW i think EA forced them to rush out the game before holidays. If it were upto Crytec im sure this game would be able to be maxed with an 8800 gts 640 easily.[/QUOTE]yeah. and if they would've optimized the game for another 10 years, they could've made it to work on my old SNES.you can't do miracle with opimization, you know... no matter if you optimize it for the rest of your life.
[QUOTE=''prowler666''][QUOTE=''bigblunt537'']BTW i think EA forced them to rush out the game before holidays. If it were upto Crytec im sure this game would be able to be maxed with an 8800 gts 640 easily.[/QUOTE]yeah. and if they would've optimized the game for another 10 years, they could've made it to work on my old SNES.you can't do miracle with opimization, you know... no matter if you optimize it for the rest of your life. [/QUOTE]



Lol
[QUOTE=''bigblunt537'']I really think this game isn't optimized well at all. I have a good cpu and gpu and play it find high/very high. The physics at very high kills my cpu/gpu and i think its just BS. Go watch ANY Mercenaries 2 video and you will see almost identical physics. The trees fall down and EVERY building in the game is fully destructible. Obviously the graphics aren't even close to touching Crysis but the physics in Crysis were just not optimized well. If a game running on a 360 and ps3 runs at very playable frame rates with insane physics then the physics in crysis should not affect performance as much as it does. Im just saying an 8800 GT should be able to kill any game the ps3 or 360 has to offer and if those consoles can handle very similar physics if not better then Crysis should run just as well if you ask me.BTW i think EA forced them to rush out the game before holidays. If it were upto Crytec im sure this game would be able to be maxed with an 8800 gts 640 easily.[/QUOTE]I just watched Mercenaries 2. Dude you need to play through crysis again if you think that physics are the same, and the physics barly slow the game down. I used to play crysis with my ati 1250, and even wiith the physics on low it looked the same as Mercenaries.
Oh yeah btw the only bad thing about the physics is in some situation you can get killed by the dumbest things. I once threw a basket against a wall it came back and killed me.
[QUOTE=''gatorteen'']Oh yeah btw the only bad thing about the physics is in some situation you can get killed by the dumbest things. I once threw a basket against a wall it came back and killed me.[/QUOTE]i definitely agree. I died once by a exploding chair. What im saying is that this game could've been easily optimized. Im not expecting miracles. But obviously they BELIEVED they could get it working on a GTS or they would have never even said it would.