Best Graphics (Poll)

What game do you think has the best graphics on the PC?Best Graphics (Poll)
Come on, is this really a debate? Crysis hands down.Best Graphics (Poll)
I beleive pong still holds that belt
Crysis wins, havn't played it but the footage i've seen and the screenshots.. its amazing.
Definitely Crysis.
What good is best visuals if it's a slideshow? Any development studio can make a GREAT looking screenshot. >>
This isn't even up for debate. It is ''fact'' that Crysis has the most advanced graphical engine made to date.
Mmmmm cant wait to run Crysis in a few days on my PC when i get it...........
[QUOTE=''FreyarHunter'']What good is best visuals if it's a slideshow? Any development studio can make a GREAT looking screenshot. >>[/QUOTE]what you the **** are you talking about? if your computer isnt a piece of **** , you can get a stable 30-40 fps in crysis on high settings...
Everyone knows Halo3 has the best graphics, best story, best gameplay, best weapons, best music, best vehicles, best setting, best physics....Crysis got my vote in the poll!
[QUOTE=''Bf2problem''] [QUOTE=''FreyarHunter'']What good is best visuals if it's a slideshow? Any development studio can make a GREAT looking screenshot. >>[/QUOTE]what you the **** are you talking about? if your computer isnt a piece of **** , you can get a stable 30-40 fps in crysis on high settings...[/QUOTE]I'm looking forward to Crysis, but you say 30-40 like its something to brag about, its not.
[QUOTE=''m2twkisfun'']I'm looking forward to Crysis, but you say 30-40 like its something to brag about, its not.[/QUOTE]
Compared to most console (PS3/360) games getting on average 30 fps and Crysis being the monster it is, 30-40 is not only playable but a great achievement.

Anything below 24 turns into a slideshow, anything above is playable and quite smooth.
[QUOTE=''m2twkisfun''][QUOTE=''Bf2problem''] [QUOTE=''FreyarHunter'']What good is best visuals if it's a slideshow? Any development studio can make a GREAT looking screenshot. >>[/QUOTE]what you the **** are you talking about? if your computer isnt a piece of **** , you can get a stable 30-40 fps in crysis on high settings...[/QUOTE]I'm looking forward to Crysis, but you say 30-40 like its something to brag about, its not.[/QUOTE]Considering gamespot's own benchmark shows that only 2 x 8800gts /gt/ gtx /ultra or 2 x 2900xt can achieve over 40 fps then yes it is something to brag about... those are top of the line machines.
I get your point, but compared to contemperary PC games, thats very underwhelming, I assume Crysis will demand the power of the next generation of GFX cards, will it not?So even the fancy 8800's can't really run Crysis.(60-100FPS's, which is what PC games ought to run at on high-end systems).
The fact that someone DIDN'T vote for Crysis surprises me. At the same time it doesn't though.

Framerate caps aren't that bad guys. Especially if they help smooth out framerates in particularly high-density combat. As far as the situation coming about, I'm not sure that the factor of Crysis requiring SLI 8800s should be ignored when comparing visual quality.
crysis hands down !
[QUOTE=''FreyarHunter'']What good is best visuals if it's a slideshow? Any development studio can make a GREAT looking screenshot. >>[/QUOTE]Agreed. That's why I'm going to pick World in Conflict. It looks better on my rig.
[QUOTE=''THGarrett'']Come on, is this really a debate? Crysis hands down.[/QUOTE]
of course I voted crysis, mainly because I think its much harder to do the kind of environments it sets out to display, also the faces and the effects are nice, gears looks good too, very gritty, fairly good texture work, cod 4 looks great for what its doing, its a very well put together beast, using some very good design to make it look as good as it does. TF2 is artistically very clean and crisp also runs well.